Exh reliyvnn

We need more relationships and marriages that last 

This exert exposes how power is sexy and how that sexiness in our society upholds patriarchy and male power over women. 

I support maintaining family lineages 

infringe on other people’s rights

I am ok with the lifestyles of straight people and LGBTQ people being out in the open as long as that out in the open behavior is ideally (but not a deal breaker) family friendly (especially no kink, no mass public indecency and no criminal acts)

Personally I am against marriages (straight marriages and same sex marriages) that fall into one or more of the following categories: marriages where the older partners would exploit younger partners, marriages that are due to an excessive, selfish lust that is motivated by desire to consume, unhealthy marriages and marriages where there would be sexual violence

Personally for marriages (straight marriages and same sex marriages) that don't fall into any of these categories,  I am against marriages (straight marriages and same sex marriages) without commitment and that infringe on other people’s rights 

Personally for marriages (straight marriages and same sex marriages) that don't fall into any of these categories, I am other side political post position on marriages (straight marriages and same sex marriages) without commitment but that don’t that infringe on other people’s rights

Personally, for marriages (straight marriages and same sex marriages) that don't fall into any of these categories, I am indifferent to marriages (straight marriages and same sex marriages) with commitment but that infringe on other people’s rights

Personally , for marriages (straight marriages and same sex marriages) that don't fall into any of these categories, I support marriages (straight marriages and same sex marriages) commitment and that don’t infringe on other people’s rights 

I would prefer that all marriages (Civil Marriage, Common Law Marriage and Religious Marriage) were abolished for both straight couples and same sex couples since I believe that marriage is a forced social construct and is state sanctioned ritualistic coupling . Marriage is a sexist and oppressive concept though at times does make some people very, very happy. 

I am generally opposed to the traditional concepts of family, education and gender roles. I am generally opposed to the institution of marriage I feel that marriage stifles individual growth and that marriage is primarily an economic arrangement in that women pays for it with their name, privacy, self-respect, and her very life. 

I see marriage as state sanctioned coupling (marriage for people of all sexual orientations ie straight and same sex) since marriage is as an exploitation at the benefit of others. I believe that people shouldn't have to do a ritualistic things like get married to get benefits like healthcare etc . 

Instead I support non-hierarchical family and educational structures and the abolishment of marriage (when we abolish the state, classes, patriarchy and hierarchies. In a stateless society, romantic partnerships would just be a personal commitment that would be honored and celebrated as the involved parties see fit. That is what marriage should be

Under we abolish the state , classes, patriarchy and hierarchies, I feel we need marriage reform to get us to that point .  I examined whether or not the state/governmental recognition of marriage (i.e marriage for straight couples and same sex couples) is a good idea or bad idea. I realized that the state/government recognizing marriages (i.e marriage for straight couples and same sex couples) is a bad idea.

The state sanctioning marriages is like people are getting married to the state and that is wrong

The state/government wrongly being involved in the marriage industry since forever, lead to the state/government unfortunately doing what they always do: taxing it, regulating it, defining it etc. The government’s involvement in marriage is more proof the state/government does little right. 

I do believe that all Americans of all sexual orientations have a right of contract 

So I want the state/government to stay out of the marriage business because romantic relationships are the business of romantic partners and not business of the state/government or anyone else. 

One way to do keep the state/government out of the marriage business would be through abolishing all current forms of public marriages (Civil Marriage, Common Law Marriage and Religious Marriage) and then legalizing Privatized Marriage throughout the US for both straight couples and same sex couples thus making Privatized Marriage the only legal form of marriage in the US for straight couples and same sex couples. 

This way marriage would be a wholly private compact of no concern to anybody but the couples themselves. Couples would conduct their own marriage ceremony without involving either State or clergy. This would be a personalized, a la carte menu of contractual rights and responsibilities. 

Another way to something like this is to abolish the current marriage system and implement a sort of domestic partnership with free association (for both straight couples and same sex couples). 

Like maybe a legislature can offer a package (for both straight couples and same sex couples) of contractual terms, with no strings attached, and no costs imposed on anyone else, where the acceptance of the terms is completely voluntary

Maybe something like a standard civil union arrangement would still be available for straight couples and same sex couples, but two roommates would share property in common and serve as health care proxies for each other without taking on any additional rights or responsibilities if they did not wish to. 

This could even include polyamorous triads sharing legal rights and responsibility for any children that came of their relationship without our having to go through a protracted political fight over whether marriage should be allowed for more than two people

Basically something like this 

I am ok with the Straight (heterosexual) lifestyle being out in the open as long as that out in the open behavior is family friendly (ie no hetereosexism, no mass public indecency and no sick criminal acts)  

Couples need to stop rushing into marriage. They need to take time to see if they are a match, so if they do get married they do not get a divorce. We need to find ways to get people to marry people they won't divorce, or won't divorce for many decades at worst.

Some people who impulsively get married too quickly get divorced at a higher rate (10%) than people who don’t impulsively get into married too quickly.  Wedlease Marriage is a creative way to fix those issues and lower those higher divorce rates among such married couples

Male patriarchy wrongly allows men to normalize acting like animals in courting women instead of normalizing being respectful and civilized when courting women . We need to abolish the Male patriarchy /patriarchy to normalize respectfully and civilly courting women

Couples who have communication issues should seek marriage counseling to communicate better.

I support stimulation of birth rate and support for young families to endure stability for the decision of motherhood. I want preferential mortgage conditions for home purchasing , public financing of the costs of small children, providing sufficient childcare facilities etc

I am fine with marriage counseling classes for married couples that are similar to the ones that Will and his fiancé went to with the Jeffersons on the Fresh Prince of Bel Air.  I also am passive to open hearted to married couples MMA training together or doing boxing classes together as a way of relieving stress of marriage

I am fine with marriage counseling classes for married couples that are similar to the ones that Will and his fiancé went to with the Jeffersons on the Fresh Prince of Bel Air.

I feel couples of all orientations should keep their intimacy in private and not out in the open. Get a room

There is nothing wrong with Sandy from Grease changing herself into a biker chic to please Danny, just like there is nothing wrong with Danny trying to be an athlete to please Sandy. Anyone who says otherwise is a offbase and misguided. 

I believe we should heavily encourage and maybe even give lucrative incentives to more religious people or Deists to adopt children   

I believe that adopting children should be easier for people

I would like child adoption to be privatized. Privatized adoption would be good since it would allow parents who don’t want the responsibility to be guardians to their children to pay someone to absolve them of that responsibility easier than in they could in a current adoption systems. 

Then I would want private child’s rights groups to be formed to ensure these privatized adoptions benefit the children being adopted more than current public children’s services who currently run adoptions ensure these benefits for adopted children

Women who marry men who are much younger than them just as long as women who marry men their own age or longer. Any science study that says otherwise is JUNK science and lying

My parents fight a lot because they annoy each other and each time I step in and break up their fighting where I play peacemaker. If I don’t do that they would keep fighting longer each time

Similar to the Apostle Paul, I believe that for singles it is good for them to remain single unless they cannot self control in which case they should get into a romantic relationship (its better to get into a romantic relationship than to burn with lust) 

I believe this because single people have more time and freedom to help make our world more progressive, and due to me believing that romantic relationships are more a forced social construct, even more so than marriages and I hate forced social constructs.   

In light of that, I would be open to the government creating a romantic relationship tax which heavily taxes Americans (of all sexual orientations) who are in a romantic relationship. However, once they get married or they became single again, that tax would be eliminated unless they get into another romantic relationship again.  

Unlike Paul, I believe that marriages give people a lot more freedom today to make the world a better place than it was during Paul's time, almost as much freedom as singles in Paul's day had for themselves.   If this tax had the negative side effect of causing less births (which I don't want since I am against Population control), then I would be against this tax unless I found some way to have this tax be legal while at the same time not causing less births.

I am glad more you g people are getting into relationships nowadays and if that keeps happening I will no longer support my tax above

Starting in the 2060s onward, I will call on way more families in the US etc having children , to the levels of the Baby Boom maybe (I will be old and senile by then)

I am against excessive, self-centered lust that is driven by desire to “consume” . Instead I believe people should love

These workshop questions from BLOODLUST: A feminist journal against civilization provide good ways to make consent more concrete and clear

I react to The Atlantic and author Molly Jong Fast’s 2021 Happy Thanksgiving article here