Fourththrbwcgjju

Sex-negative feminism is not a repudiation or even a rebranding of historical and present-day radical feminism. It is, to all effect, that same radical feminism – I am simply interested in whether we can take back the label of “sex-negative” by clearly setting out what it stands for. Sex-negative feminism is not the political activity of  Right-Wing Women , described by Dworkin in the following quote from the book: From father’s house to husband’s house to a grave that still might not be her own, a woman acquiesces to male authority in order to gain some protection from male violence. She conforms, in order to be as safe as she can be. This strategy requires each woman to submit not only to her husband/warden, but to wide-ranging and restrictive moral rules for women, enforced on women by both men and other women. Women who do not meet this code are ‘ruined’ and are understood to have brought any consequences on themselves. If they had followed the code, then – according to the vie...

I am glad that I am a Libertarian Socialist because Libertarian Socialism is the proper and natural extension of Classical Liberalism into the era of advanced industrial society. This classical liberalism fills the previous big hole of classical liberalism with goodness Marxism is good because it is an extension of Liberalism and is a better extension of Liberalism than Liberalism 2.0. But Marxism should not be mixed with Liberalism 2.0  I agree with what Vaush said here  “When (Karl) Marx and following theorists wrote on capitalism they weren't writing 'capitalism and liberalism are worst things to ever happen to humanity, they are the greatest oppression of workers'. No. Marxism is supposed to be an extension of liberalism not a rejection of it, a true promotion of unity, fraternity, and freedom, and liberty, etc. That's what Marxism and that's what leftism is about, it's about bringing the messaging of the liberal movement forward, to make it better, to make ...

I believe in a fair society but we can’t get it through liberal democracy. Liberal democracy is built against us. Hence why I am hostile to liberal democracy   Liberal Democracy is wrong because it is a bourgeois concept and could be seen as a bourgeois dictatorship  Liberalism does not and is not meantmg to apply to all people of a nation, but only the (potentially colonial) bourgeoisie. when the US is discussed as the land of the free and possesses democracy as a value, it is not that these are absent: they are present, but that it is only for the ruling class. just, none for anyone else. Liberal Democracy is inevitably taken over by elites who mislead the people about what is best for them, which prevents the people from actually getting their fair share of things even in a "democracy".   Liberal democracy is really just a facade for the class dictatorship of the capitalists. They will not hesitate to seize authoritarian power when they deem it as necessary, as we can ...

Abortion See here Feminism movements See here

We need more relationships and marriages that last  This exert  exposes how power is sexy and how that sexiness in our society upholds patriarchy and male power over women.  I support maintaining family lineages  infringe on other people’s rights I am ok with the lifestyles of straight people and LGBTQ people being out in the open as long as that out in the open behavior is ideally (but not a deal breaker) family friendly (especially no kink, no mass public indecency and no criminal acts) Personally I am against marriages (straight marriages and same sex marriages) that fall into one or more of the following categories: marriages where the older partners would exploit younger partners, marriages that are due to an excessive, selfish lust that is motivated by desire to consume, unhealthy marriages and marriages where there would be sexual violence Personally for marriages (straight marriages and same sex marriages) that don't fall into any of these categories ,  ...

Despite me being a left feminist, it's with great sorrow that I have to say that I strongly do not support  feminists and other women saying ’kill all men’.( this post  is a good discussion on it) Saying killallmen is prejudice, counter productive hateful evil and  violent. We should shadow censor that and not allow it to be normalized. See  this  and also see  here  for more.  For Suzanna Danuta Walters’s article, I acknowledge that she and other feminists don’t literally mean "We should all hate men," and that her and similar feminists are making a purposefully hyperbolic point.  However, I still must critique. I also bring up the criticism of Suzanna Danuta Walters’s statement in her own article. After this, Walters somehow justifies it with something on the order of "if I can't hate men then I'm not allowed to be angry or talk about certain women's issues". Which, unless I'm missing something vital, is b.s. When some like says someth...